Which of the following best describes Katie Eriksson's metaparadigm in nursing?

Katie Eriksson’s metaparadigm in nursing emphasizes the significance of love and charity as fundamental motives of caring. This perspective highlights the relational and ethical dimensions of nursing, where the act of caring is rooted in profound respect, compassion, and commitment to the well-being of patients. Eriksson argues that care is not merely a function of technical skills or scientific knowledge, but rather a deeply personal and humanistic endeavor that seeks to address the holistic needs of individuals.

By focusing on love and charity, Eriksson’s framework invites nurses to engage with patients on an emotional and spiritual level, emphasizing the importance of empathy and connection in the caregiving process. This approach fosters a supportive environment where patients feel valued and understood, ultimately enhancing the healing experience.

In contrast, the other options either narrow the scope of nursing to specific aspects—like technical care or scientific methods—or focus solely on emotional needs, missing the broader, integrative view that Eriksson advocates. Her metaparadigm encourages a comprehensive understanding of caring that encompasses emotional, physical, ethical, and relational health, making the emphasis on love and charity the most fitting representation of her philosophy.